19 September 2010
When will they start making journalists take science classes?
Slashdot recently posted a reference to a Washington Post editorial by Hugh Price about a plan to save the world that, apparently, Hugh just pulled out of his imagination. I won’t spend much time analyzing the many flaws in his idea to capture atmospheric carbon by piling up landfills of agricultural waste. The crux of it, however, is that he seems to think that if you don’t aerate ag waste like you do with compost , it would never degrade, because, “Without access to oxygen , bacteria cannot break down plant material.” Price misses the vast majority of all species on the planet: anaerobic microbes. They are quite good at turning organic material into carbon dioxide and methane. This happens in all animal guts, including yours, as well as anaerobic digesters, soils, underwater sediments, bogs, etc. His garbage heap “solution” sounds, to me, like an anaerobic digester. It would transform the waste into carbon dioxide and methane. Methane, by the way, has a green house gas equivalent of about ten times that of carbon dioxide. However, you can capture the methane and burn it to generate electricity. There’s nothing novel about this; we’ve been doing it with our agricultural waste for decades. Especially in Europe where, for example, Germany has ~4,500 cooperative facilities solely for the purpose of anaerobic breakdown of agricultural waste (a combination of plant material and manure) and capturing the methane produced, to be used as green energy.
I am not suggesting that a newspaper editor should know anything about anaerobic digestion. However, there is one extremely key thing he should have learned in some sort of science class (or even in one or two of the journalism classes he may have taken): If you don’t know how something works, look it up.
If he had asked anyone working in agricultural waste, or microbiology, they would have pointed out the many problems with his hair-brained scheme. I’m excited to see journalists getting interested in science, and I’m glad they’re trying to come up with creative articles to engage people in climate change issues. However,rather than spouting off nonsense, it would be preferable if they did some research. My title is not meant to suggest that Price should have taken a class on agricultural waste treatment; rather, any science class should have, first and foremost, given him the critical skills necessary to research his idea before writing a big old editorial on it.
Image: An anaerobic digester for agricultural waste. Image by Alex Marshall, Clarke Energy Ltd, Creative Commons-BY-3.0 license.
Filed by jeff at 4:44 pm under Science
Comments Off

